Margaret Meade was born in 1901, a time when a woman’s place wasn’t doing field research in island jungles. That didn’t matter to her a wit when she went to Samoa at the age of twenty-three to study the life of the residents. Turned out, she had an excellent eye for decoding what she saw. Plus, she could write–not in the stodgy scientific way of most researchers, but with words people understood. She made them care about these far-away lives by relating their lives to emotions every person understands–love, hate, dreams, joy, child caring. Here are words you’ve heard, probably didn’t know they came from Margaret Mead:
It takes a village.
The primitive tribe who inspired these words likely no longer exists, but the power of the emotion rings true even today.
Her time in Samoa resulted in the first of forty immensely popular books on how human beings get along in groups–cultural anthropology. Her subjects were mostly preliterate, non-Western civilizations, and chock full of brilliance, empathy, common sense–traits ascribed usually to modern, civilized peoples, not those who wear loin clothes and live in huts.
I discovered Margaret Mead because I wanted to understand how mankind arrived at our current evolved state of culture (religious, art-lovers, decorating our bodies, problem-solvers able to ignore instinct in favor of cognitive decisions–traits that set us apart from every other living species). I’d emptied my local library of books by the obvious experts–Donald Johanson and the famous Lucy
the Leakeys and their ground-breaking work in Africa’s Cradle of Mankind
GHR Von Koenigswald and his Meeting Prehistoric Man
–dozens more. I learned a lot about my ancestors, but what I could read was limited by the physical evidence. Anything that couldn’t be pinned to artifacts couldn’t be concluded.
I needed more if I was to understand enough to write my book on the life of our first ancestors. I needed the stuff that didn’t fossilize.
Early man was ruled by nature–how does anyone survive predators with fangs and claws and really thick skin? What does a natural habitat look like without even a grass hut or fire for protection? I turned to nature writers like Peter Matthiessen.
I nibbled around the edges of our arrival as the genus, Homo, two million years ago, and studied close species. Dian Fossy‘s gorillas
and Birut Galdikas‘ orangutans
(who devoted their lives to understanding the humanity within our closest primate cousins), Jane Goodall and her chimpanzees (read every book she ever wrote)
Desmond Morris‘ unique look at mankind.
Understanding Great Apes and orangutans and chimpanzees proved valuable, but insufficient, so I turned to primitive tribes–evolved by early man standards, but antiquated by modern world standards. Why do Pygmies not have a leader? I explored current primitive tribes through the eyes of Colin Turbull (The Forest People),
John Beattie’s Bunyoro: An African Kingdom,
and Tepilit Ole Saitoti’s Maasai Warrior.
I read E. Adamson Hoebel who wrote a one-of-a-kind book called The Law of Primitive Man. When did ‘consensus’ and ‘following rules’ become more important than ‘doing what’s right’? For that, I read field research curated into a wonderful book called “Social Life of Early Man”.
Arguably, it’s our big brain that’s responsible for our current position atop the food chain so I devoured experts like Christopher Wills and his eminently readable Runaway Brain.
What parts of our brain do what–and when did they get big enough to do that? Neanderthal brains were larger than ours, but in the wrong places. Symbolism and the ability to count seemed to be keys (lots of primitive tribes don’t count–many have no need to go past five when a well-worded description can distance and group size). Writers like Lev Vygotsky (his amazing research into how we count) enraptured me.
What made us go beyond the horizon to parts unknown, even when we had a nice home that kept us safe and dry? Primates don’t do that. Alligators stay in their swamps. No other species searches out inclement conditions and decides to test their survival skills. Why do we?
Margaret Mead seems to struggle with the same questions, though where my timeframe is 2 million years BCE, hers is the 1900’s. And rather than from the comfort of her Google browser and local library, she goes to the primary sources. Letters from the Field 1925-1975 (Harper Collins 1977) starts in Samoa but includes the Admiralty Islands, American Indians, New Guinea, Bali and Iatmul. She evaluated their lives by living with them, understanding their languages, thriving in their cultural worlds.
Next week, I’ll discuss this book more, share some of my favorite parts.
More on research:
Book Review: A Virtual Tour of Africa
How to Virtually Visit a Location You Can’t Drop In On
Photo credit: By Smithsonian Institution from United States (Margaret Mead (1901-1978) Uploaded by Fæ) [see page for license], via Wikimedia Commons
Jacqui Murray is the author of the popular Building a Midshipman, the story of her daughter’s journey from high school to United States Naval Academy. She is webmaster for six blogs, an Amazon Vine Voice book reviewer, a columnist for Examiner.com and TeachHUB, Editorial Review Board member for Journal for Computing Teachers, monthly contributor to Today’s Author and a freelance journalist on tech ed topics. In her free time, she is editor of technology training books for how to integrate technology in education.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Margaret Meade was an amazing observer of people. I loved this book.
Pingback: Book Review: Law of Primitive Man « Jacqui Murray
Pingback: Book Review: Law of Primitive Man | WordDreams...
This is some serious in-depth research. You’re not messing around. I think you could teach a course on the subject too:) I got to spend some time this summer at the Hopi Indian Reservation in Arizona (my husband is half Hopi Indian). Within the reservation is the oldest continuously inhabited village in America–Old Oraibi–dating back to 1100 AD. It was a fascinating step back in time. There’s something to be said for visiting these places…it feels like you’re standing on time itself. It’s amazing to contemplate.
Pingback: Book Review: Letters From the Field Part II | WordDreams...
Pingback: Book Review: Letters From the Field Part II « Jacqui Murray
Great collection. I loved the film, Gorillas in the mist.
So sad, though. Dian put so much of herself into her gorillas, who could recover?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh yes, very sad. I left the movie all in tears, it really breaks one heart to see.
I’ve only read a very few of these books and don’t know most of the authors. You are so thorough and devoted when it comes to research. Thank you for this overview of studies about what makes us human. There is much here to consider reading. I’m in awe of your achievements, Jacqui.
It’s much more hobby than achievement. I had dreams when I started, but there still as far off as ever. Sigh.
I remember reading something she wrote, but can’t recall the title. She was a great writer. I’m glad she didn’t have too much of an academic style, otherwise it’d be hard to read.
Those mashup words take some decoding don’t they? No, she wrote for Everyman.
I love stuff like this and wish I had more time or really more energy for further education. I can’t write and do long distance courses which is what I was doing before writing. But that’s what’s great about books. You can still pick them up can’t you. Thanks for this.
This worked for me because it seemed like pleasure reading. It grabbed me that firmly!
I heard of Jane Goodall and some of her work. It IS fascinating stuff. Wow, Jacqui, you sure have studied this subject. I don’t know how you find the time for all the things you do. ❤ I can no longer multi-task.
I have been at it for over a decade. It’s more of a hobby than real writing!
Whew, even so, that’s a lot of concentration. You’re an expert now. 🙂
Quite some collection you have gone through. I hv read about Jane Goodall and the seminal work she did thru several Nat Geo issues. Good to come across and read about people who can challenge existing notions and push boundaries.
She changed our definition of human over and over. She also made me realize chimps are way to close cousins to Homo sapiens to be dismissed as irrelevant.